SEBI Interim Order Compliance: Jane Street Deposits ₹4,843 Crore in Escrow

 Mumbai, July 15, 2025 – In a pivotal move that marks a turning point in the ongoing SEBI enforcement saga, global trading powerhouse Jane Street has complied with the regulator’s interim order by depositing ₹4,843.57 crore (≈ US$567 million) into a SEBI‑designated escrow account. This follows the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s landmark interim order issued on July 3, 2025, pertaining to alleged manipulative trading in the Bank Nifty and Nifty derivative markets .

1. 🔍 Background to the SEBI Action 

• Allegations: SEBI alleged that from Jan 2023 to May 2025, Jane Street orchestrated a repeated pattern of intraday trades designed to distort the closing levels of Bank Nifty and Nifty indices 

• Manipulative Strategy: The tactic reportedly involved building large cash and futures positions in constituent stocks early in the day to move the index, then reversing those positions and profiting from offsetting short options — effectively manipulating settlement values Legal 500.

• Scale of Trading: On one key expiry day (Jan 17, 2024), Jane Street traded ₹4,370 crore in constituent stocks and ₹5,372 crore in derivatives, earning ₹734.93 crore in a single session 

• Market Implications: SEBI flagged that such activity led to retail investor losses of over ₹1.06 lakh crore in FY24‑25, while proprietary trading firms, including Jane Street, earned sizable returns 

2. ✅ What the Interim Order Mandated 

Issued under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11B(1), and 11D of the SEBI Act, the July 3 order:

Mandatory Actions:

• Impounded Gains: Directed Jane Street to deposit ₹4,843.57 crore (calculated as “illegal gains”) into an escrow account with a SEBI lien 

• Trading Ban: Temporarily barred four Jane Street entities (including its Singapore, Asia, and India arms) from trading in Indian securities.

• Restricted Transfers: Instructed banks and depositories to prevent any withdrawal or transfer of funds/assets from these entities without SEBI permission 

• Mandatory Shut‑Down: Gave SEBI authority to lift restrictions only after full escrow compliance 

3. 💰 Jane Street’s Escrow Deposit

• Deposit Details: On July 14, 2025, Jane Street deposited ₹4,843.57 crore into a scheduled commercial bank escrow account, adhering to SEBI’s requirements 

• Without Prejudice: The firm emphasized the deposit was "without prejudice" to its legal position and reserved the right to contest SEBI’s allegations 

Quick Snapshot:

Item	Details
Amount Deposited	₹4,843.57 crore (≈ US$560–567 million)
Purpose	Comply with "illegal gains" disgorgement requirement
SEBI Timeline	Order issued Jul 3; deposit by Jul 14
Deposit Nature	Held in escrow with SEBI lien – non-disposable until directed

4. 🛠 Request for Lifting Trading Restrictions 

• Formal Request: Along with the deposit, Jane Street petitioned SEBI to lift restrictions — allowing banks and depositories to resume normal business with its entities 

• Regulator’s Position: SEBI confirmed it is examining the request, noting the initial order said restrictions could be lifted once the deposit condition was fulfilled 

• Legal Recourse: Jane Street retains the option to challenge the interim order via the Securities Appellate Tribunal within the 21-day timeframe 

5. 📉 Impact on Markets & Future Oversight

• Derivatives Turnover Drops: SEBI data revealed a 21% dip in aggregate expiry-day turnover between July 3 and July 11 — a direct result of Jane Street’s temporary absence 

• Retail Market Pressure: SEBI emphasized high-frequency manipulation worsened outcomes for unsophisticated traders, intensifying calls for tighter oversight

• Regulatory Signal: This high-profile clampdown shows SEBI’s growing assertiveness in scrutinizing foreign portfolio investors and high-frequency trading firms Legal 500.

6. 🌍 Global Reaction & Jane Street’s Defense 

• Jane Street’s Defense: The firm maintains it was engaging in "basic index arbitrage", a widely accepted strategy, and that SEBI’s definitions of manipulative practices are overly broad 

• FT Coverage: Financial Times noted Jane Street earned more than US$4.3 billion in India between Jan 2023 and Mar 2025, but denies accusations of a "sinister scheme" 

• SEBI, FT & Reuters: Establishing an international spotlight, multiple outlets highlight wider implications for global trading firms and market regulators alike .

7. 🎯 Key Takeaways & What Lies Ahead

1. Market Enforcement: SEBI is showing zero tolerance on presumed market abuse—deliberate or systemic.

2. Policy Lessons: India’s dominance in derivatives markets demands stricter regulation on HFT and prop trading firms.

3. Jane Street’s Path Forward:

   • Await SEBI’s decision on easing restrictions

   • Potential judicial challenge via SAT

   • Continued scrutiny on other index trades (Sensex, BankNifty)

4. Industry Watch: Other global prop-trading firms may now re-evaluate strategies and compliance posture in India.

8. 📝 Conclusion

Jane Street’s decision to deposit ₹4,843.57 crore into escrow underlines SEBI’s growing resolve to police market conduct—especially in high-frequency, high-impact segments like the derivatives market. While this deposit marks a critical compliance milestone, the larger questions of regulatory boundaries, trading ethics, and market fairness remain.

For retail investors, regulators, and global trading firms, this episode reinforces the importance of transparency and trust in maintaining India’s position as a leading derivatives hub. As SEBI continues, the ultimate rulings—regarding account lifting, judicial outcomes, and sector-wide recommendations—could unveil new frameworks for oversight in emerging market economies.

❓ FAQs

Q1. What exactly did SEBI allege?
SEBI claimed Jane Street inflated index levels via simultaneous cash and futures trades to benefit from offsetting options positions—an alleged manipulative strategy on Bank Nifty and Nifty expiry days. 

Q2. Why ₹4,843.57 crore?
This figure represents SEBI’s calculation of “illegal gains” from identified manipulative instances between January 2023 and May 2025. 

Q3. Is Jane Street banned permanently?
No, the prohibition was interim. Once escrow compliance is verified, SEBI may lift it. Jane Street has also taken legal steps to challenge the order.

Q4. Impact on retail investors?
SEBI warned such trading patterns inflate volatility and settlement prices, which disproportionately harm small investors—who have already lost over ₹1 lakh crore in the derivatives market. Reuters

Q5. What’s next?

• SEBI may lift restrictions post-review

• Jane Street might appeal to SAT

• SEBI’s probe may expand to other indices

• Market participants await regulatory guidelines and safeguards.

Keywords:

• SEBI interim order Jane Street

• Jane Street escrow deposit

• SEBI Bank Nifty manipulation

• Indian derivatives regulatory compliance

• Jane Street trading ban India