learn with manika

SEBI Enforces Digital Accessibility Mandate for Market Intermediaries

SEBI Enforces Digital Accessibility Mandate for Market Intermediaries

 

Introduction

In a landmark move effective from 31 July 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has mandated that all SEBI-regulated entities must ensure their digital platforms are accessible to persons with disabilities. This directive stems from a Supreme Court ruling that recognised digital access as part of fundamental rights, compelling SEBI to operationalise inclusion in the securities market. The move affects stock exchanges, brokers, mutual funds, investment advisors, and other intermediaries, instituting clear timelines, audit obligations, and reporting mandates.

 

Background and Context

The legal foundation: RPwD Act and the Supreme Court judgment

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 requires that information and communication technology (ICT) platforms be accessible to persons with disabilities (PwDs). SEBI’s move aligns with Sections 40, 42 and 46 of the RPwD Act, which mandate accessibility of services, timely accommodation, and access to ICT.

In April 2025, two key Supreme Court decisions—Pragya Prasun & Ors. v. Union of India and Amar Jain v. Union of India—held that digital access is a component of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. The Court specifically addressed disadvantages faced by visually impaired persons or those with disfigurement in e-KYC and digital services, directing governmental and regulatory agencies to institute standards.

Why this matters

·        Inclusion in capital markets: Many digital services (trading apps, investor portals, disclosures) remain inaccessible to PwDs, effectively excluding them from equal participation in financial markets.

·        Investor protection & equality: SEBI is tasked with protecting investor interests; excluding PwDs from seamless access would run contrary to equitable treatment objectives.

·        Global & national convergence: The mandate brings India in line with global best practices (e.g. WCAG 2.1, European Accessibility Act) and domestic standards (GIGW, IS 17802).

·        Operational clarity for industry: Prior to this, accessibility obligations remained largely voluntary or advisory. The SEBI circular provides enforcement teeth.

Before this, several sectors (especially government websites) were required to follow Guidelines for Indian Government Websites (GIGW) and other accessibility norms; but financial intermediaries had no clear enforceable deadline. SEBI’s step marks the first time accessibility is made a mandatory compliance parameter in securities law.

 

Detailed Explanation of the SEBI Mandate

Scope & applicability

SEBI’s Circular No. SEBI/HO/ITD-1/ITD_VIAP/P/CIR/2025/111, issued on 31 July 2025, applies to all Regulated Entities (REs) under SEBI’s purview. These include but are not limited to:

·        Recognised stock exchanges and clearing corporations

·        Depositories

·        Brokers, sub-brokers, depository participants

·        Asset management companies (AMCs), mutual funds, registrars

·        Portfolio managers, investment advisors, research analysts

·        KYC registration agencies, merchant bankers, intermediary entities

The scope extends to all investor-facing digital platforms, such as:

·        Websites and web portals

·        Mobile applications

·        Investor dashboards

·        Digital communications (PDFs, emails, disclosures, notices)

·        Multimedia content (videos, audio)

Standards & technical requirements

SEBI mandates adherence to:

1.     WCAG 2.1 (or latest version) Level AA or above (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines by W3C)

2.     GIGW (Guidelines for Indian Government Websites)

3.     IS 17802 (Indian Standard for accessibility in ICT products and services)

4.     Provisions under the RPwD Act and its Rules (Rule 15(1)(c), etc.)

Some of the technical features required are:

·        Alternate text for images

·        Tagged PDFs, logical reading order, semantic markup

·        Captioning / transcripts for audio/video

·        Descriptive audio / narration for visual content

·        Indian Sign Language (ISL) support where applicable

·        Keyboard navigability, contrast and readability, ARIA attributes, and compatibility with assistive technologies

·        Accessible forms, error messages, and clear navigation flows

Timelines & phased compliance

SEBI issued a follow-up circular SEBI/HO/ITD-1/ITD_VIAP/P/CIR/2025/121 on 29 August 2025, which revised or clarified timelines for certain categories such as Investment Advisors and Research Analysts.

Under the compliance guidelines (Circular No. SEBI/HO/ITD-1/ITD_VIAP/P/CIR/2025/131, dated 25 September 2025), the following schedules are set:

Milestone

Deadline

Submission of list of digital platforms + compliance report

30 September 2025

Appointment of IAAP-certified accessibility auditor

14 December 2025

Conduct full accessibility audit

30 April 2026

Remediation & compliance of audit findings

31 July 2026

Annual accessibility audit & reporting

30 April 2027 (and 30 days post each subsequent FY)

Reporting lines:

·        Brokers / Depository Participants report to exchanges / depositories

·        Investment Advisors / Research Analysts report to BSE Ltd.

·        Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs), AMCs, and other REs report directly to SEBI via a prescribed format and email channel

Governance, accountability & redressal

SEBI places responsibility at the highest level:

·        The Managing Director / Managing Partner / Proprietor of an RE must ensure compliance.

·        A Nodal Officer must be designated (or in absence, compliance officer assumes role) to oversee accessibility tasks.

·        A grievance redressal mechanism must be established, easily accessible to PwDs, with escalation paths.

·        Entities must ensure training, awareness and embed “accessible by design” principles in procurement, vendor contracts, and development processes.

 

Impact Analysis

Beneficiaries & those under pressure

Beneficiaries

·        Persons with disabilities: will gain equitable access to trading, disclosures, KYC, statements, investor communications.

·        Small investors: can interact directly across intermediaries without needing special effort or third-party mediation.

·        Trust & reputation: regulated entities that implement well may build goodwill and brand value for social responsibility.

Under pressure

·        Smaller intermediaries and advisory firms face resource, cost, and technical challenges.

·        Technology vendors/solution providers need rapid upskilling to deliver accessible digital solutions.

·        Auditors certified under IAAP could see capacity crunch, possibly high fees due to limited supply.

Practical implications

For Businesses / Regulated Entities

·        Budgeting & resourcing: costs for audits, remediation, re-development, staff training, vendor contracts.

·        Procurement: all new digital tools and SaaS must be accessibility-compliant.

·        Governance: ensure accountability, embed accessibility into policy, processes, quality checks.

·        Reporting burden: periodic audits and submissions.

For Taxpayers / Investors

·        Investors with disabilities will have better usability and independence.

·        No direct tax impact, but cost burdens on intermediaries may partly translate into service charges or pricing pressure.

For Auditors / CAs / Assurance Professionals

·        Demand for certified accessibility auditors will rise.

·        CAs or auditors with digital/tech expertise may expand service lines into accessibility assurance.

·        Third-party firms may need collaboration with accessibility professionals (designers, engineers).

Risks & challenges

·        Scarce IAAP-certified auditors: Some smaller advisers have flagged auditor scarcity and high cost estimates.

·        Technical gaps: Legacy systems, older platforms, or vendors may resist large refactoring.

·        Enforcement & follow-up: How rigorously SEBI enforces penalties or compliance in practice remains a question.

·        Uniform interpretation: Discrepancies in how WCAG or IS 17802 interpret in context of financial portals may arise.

 

Common Misunderstandings

·        Some believe only public websites are affected — no: investor portals, apps, digital communications also fall under mandate.

·        Assumption that automatic tools alone suffice — on the contrary, manual and usability testing (esp. with PwDs) is required.

·        That smaller firms are exempt — all SEBI-regulated intermediaries are covered, though timelines may differ.

·        Confusing accessibility with security or privacy requirements — while linked, accessibility is a distinct compliance axis.

·        Thinking one-time compliance is enough — SEBI mandates annual audits and ongoing reporting.

 

Expert Commentary

From my two decades in finance and taxation, this regulation is a watershed. While the intent is laudable and overdue, the real challenge lies in execution. Smaller intermediaries might struggle with the technical and fiscal burden; a phased or capacity-building support from SEBI or industry bodies would be helpful. Over time, though, the move can set a new benchmark — financial inclusion is incomplete without digital inclusion.

As one industry consultant puts it:

“The circular is progressive, but the ecosystem (auditors, developers) must scale swiftly; otherwise, compliance will become pro forma, not substantive.”

 

Conclusion & Action Steps

SEBI’s mandate is a seminal turn for India’s financial sector: digital accessibility is no longer optional but a regulated necessity. The industry now must shift from advisory compliance to structural transformation.

Key takeaways & next steps for entities:

1.     Prepare inventory: Catalogue all digital assets (websites, apps, investor tools).

2.     Appoint nodal officer: Ensure top-level accountability and oversight.

3.     Engage certified auditors early: Given limited availability, secure funding and contracts early.

4.     Conduct audits & remediation: Use inclusive testing with PwDs, adopt WCAG / IS 17802 standards.

5.     Embed accessibility in procurement: All future digital tools, RFPs, vendor agreements must include accessibility compliance clauses.

6.     Train staff & vendors: Sensitize teams about assistive technologies, accessible UI/UX, and inclusive communication.

7.     Set up grievance redressal mechanism: Provide easy channels for PwDs to log issues and get resolution.

8.     Annual review & reporting: Conduct periodic audits and file timely compliance reports as per SEBI’s schedule.

Going forward, expect further clarifications, industry bodies issuing best practices, and possibly central government or SEBI offering templates or audit accreditation programs. The pace of technology (AI, voice UI, generative interfaces) may also play into how accessibility evolves in securities markets.

In sum: this is not just a regulatory compliance step — it is a structural shift bridging financial markets and disability rights, reinforcing that inclusive access must be intrinsic, not afterthought.

 

FAQs

Q1. Does this mandate apply to non-SEBI regulated firms like NBFCs or banks?
No. This SEBI circular applies only to SEBI-regulated entities / intermediaries under its jurisdiction (exchanges, brokers, funds, advisors). Other regulators may issue their own mandates.

Q2. What if a firm cannot find an IAAP-certified auditor?
That is a real challenge, especially for smaller players. Firms should proactively engage auditors early, even reserve slots or consortium with peer firms. SEBI may provide flexibility in interim, but non-compliance is risky.

Q3. Can automated accessibility scanning tools suffice?
No. While automated scans catch many issues, manual testing and usability testing with PwDs are mandatory to ensure real-world accessibility. The rules demand depth beyond automation.

Q4. Will SEBI impose penalties for non-compliance?
While the circular itself focuses on timelines and reporting, SEBI has enforcement powers under the SEBI Act (e.g. under Section 11). Repeated non-compliance may invite regulatory action, show cause notices or restrictions.

Q5. Does this impose additional tax on firms?
Not directly. There is no specific tax on accessibility compliance. However, firms may incur capital or operating expenditure for remediations, audits, development, training, which would be allowed under normal business expense deductions.

 

References / Source Links

1.     SEBI compliance guidelines on digital accessibility circular (SEBI)

2.     TaxGuru on SEBI compliance guidelines and timelines

3.     BarrierBreak commentary on SEBI’s mandate

4.     Moneycontrol report on small advisers’ concerns

5.     Leglobal on SEBI’s circular and scope

6.     Deque blog on SEBI’s new standard

7.     Business Today coverage of SEBI directive

8.     Taxmann note on timeline extension

9.     King Stubb & Kasiva legal insight

10.  Legality Simplified overview

 


Previous Post Next Post

نموذج الاتصال