
Introduction: Why Absorption Costing Still Matters
Today
If you’ve ever wondered why two
companies with similar sales figures report completely different profits, the
answer often lies in how they calculate their product costs — and
absorption costing plays the lead role here. Even though many modern management
courses highlight marginal costing or variable costing for decision-making,
absorption costing remains the backbone of financial reporting, taxation,
and inventory valuation all over the world.
Whether you’re a commerce student,
a factory manager, a CA aspirant, or someone who simply wants to
understand how companies determine the “real” cost of manufacturing a product,
absorption costing is something you cannot skip. Accounting standards across
India and the world — GAAP, IAS-2, Companies Act, and Cost Accounting Standards
— all mandate it.
But here’s the interesting part:
absorption costing is not just about “adding all costs together.” It is a
mindset — a way of viewing production as a complete process where every
resource you use (including fixed overheads) contributes to the final cost of
your product.
In this article, we’ll break down
the entire topic in a way that feels less like a textbook and more like a
conversation. You’ll see examples, stories, comparisons, formulas, journal
entries, exam-focused notes, and even tips for scoring better in accounting
exams.
Welcome to this deep-dive guide on Absorption
Costing, presented by Learn with Manika, your trusted platform for
simplified, expert-backed commerce learning.
Background & Evolution of Absorption Costing
Absorption costing didn’t appear
overnight. Its roots go back to a time when industries were heavily dependent
on manual labor and large-scale manufacturing plants. Back then, companies
needed a dependable method to figure out the exact cost of producing goods.
Without accurate cost calculations, how would they set a price, calculate
profit, or decide on inventory values?
Early
20th Century: Rise of Industrial Manufacturing
As factories grew bigger and mass
production became the new normal, businesses realized that ignoring fixed
factory costs (like rent, building depreciation, or supervisor salaries) would
make financial statements misleading. Imagine a factory that pays ₹50 lakh in
fixed overheads every year — if we ignore this amount in cost computation, the
financials fall apart.
Thus, absorption costing became the
standard that accountants relied on.
Global
Adoption
International accounting bodies
formalized it:
- GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles)
- IAS-2 (Inventories)
- IFRS frameworks
All endorsed absorption costing for
preparing external financial statements.
Indian
Practices
In India, absorption costing is
integrated deeply into:
- Companies Act, 2013
- Tax audit guidelines
- Cost Accounting Standards (CAS-1 to CAS-16)
- Cost audit reports for manufacturing units
ERP systems like SAP, Tally
Prime, Oracle, and QuickBooks also treat absorption costing as default for
inventory valuation.
Even today, this method is
indispensable in sectors like textiles, automobiles, FMCG, steel,
pharmaceuticals, and electronics manufacturing.
What Is Absorption Costing?
Absorption Costing — also known as Full
Costing — is a method in which all manufacturing costs are included
in the cost of a product. This includes:
- Direct Material
- Direct Labour
- Variable Factory Overheads
- Fixed Factory Overheads
Selling and administrative expenses,
however, are treated as period costs and excluded from product cost.
In simple words:
Every unit produced “absorbs” a
portion of all manufacturing costs — whether they vary with production or not.
Imagine baking 100 cakes in your
bakery. The cost of flour and sugar varies per cake, but the rent you pay for
the bakery does not. Yet, each cake must absorb its share of rent. That’s the
philosophy behind absorption costing.
Why Absorption Costing Is So Important
You might ask, “Why can’t companies
just use marginal costing? Isn't it simpler?” Yes, marginal costing is simple
and excellent for decisions. But absorption costing is legally required for
several reasons.
Here’s why this method matters:
✓ 1. Mandatory for External Financial Reporting
Companies preparing annual accounts must
use absorption costing. This affects:
- Balance Sheet
- Profit & Loss Statement
- Inventory valuation
- Tax calculations
✓ 2. Accurate Inventory Valuation
Under marginal costing, closing
stock excludes fixed overhead. This understates asset value and distorts
profits. Absorption costing prevents this issue.
✓ 3. Profit Measurement Across Periods
If production levels fluctuate,
profits may appear distorted unless fixed costs are properly allocated.
✓ 4. Pricing, Tendering & Government Contracts
When a company participates in:
- Government tenders
- Export quotations
- Cost-plus contracts
… full cost must be shown.
Absorption costing makes this possible.
✓ 5. Better Capacity Planning
When overheads are absorbed
consistently, managers can analyze:
- Idle time
- Cost variances
- Production efficiency
To sum it up:
Absorption costing focuses on cost
accumulation, while marginal costing focuses on decision-making. Both coexist,
but for different purposes.
Components of Absorption Costing
Let’s break down the cost components
in a relatable way.
1.
Direct Material (DM)
These are the raw materials that
become part of your product.
Example: Wood for furniture, fabric for garments.
2.
Direct Labour (DL)
Wages paid to workers who are
directly involved in producing goods.
3.
Factory Overheads
This includes everything else that
helps run the factory.
Variable Factory Overheads (VFOH)
- Power
- Lubricants
- Consumable stores
- Machine repairs (variable portion)
Fixed Factory Overheads (FFOH)
- Factory rent
- Supervisor salaries
- Depreciation
- Insurance of factory equipment
These costs do not change with
output — but under absorption costing, each unit still absorbs a fair share.
Excluded
Costs
These are not included in
product cost:
- Selling expenses
- Office administration
- Advertising
- Distribution
They are charged directly to the
period.
Absorption Costing Formula (Easy Breakdown)
The standard formula used worldwide
is:
1.
Total Manufacturing Cost (TMC)
TMC = Direct Material + Direct
Labour + Factory Overheads (VFOH + FFOH)
2.
Cost Per Unit (CPU)
CPU = Total Manufacturing Cost ÷
Units Produced
When fixed costs are included in
CPU, that unit is fully costed.
Let’s illustrate this using a
real-world-like example shortly.
Journal Entries in Absorption Costing (Manufacturing
Cycle)
Commerce students often memorize
journal entries without understanding the logic. Let's simplify them with
reasoning.
1.
Purchase of Raw Material
Raw Material A/c Dr.
To Creditors A/c
Reason: You are stocking inventory.
2.
Issue of Raw Material to Production
Work-in-Progress A/c Dr.
To Raw Material A/c
3.
Direct Labour Cost
WIP A/c Dr.
To Wages Payable A/c
4.
Factory Overheads Incurred
Factory Overhead A/c Dr.
To Various Expenses A/c
5.
Allocation of Overheads to WIP
WIP A/c Dr.
To Factory Overhead A/c
6.
Transfer to Finished Goods
Finished Goods A/c Dr.
To WIP A/c
7.
Sale of Goods
Debtor/Cash A/c Dr.
To Sales A/c
8.
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
COGS A/c Dr.
To Finished Goods A/c
If you understand these entries, you
essentially understand the flow of the entire cost accounting system.
Detailed Examples
Let’s get into the part loved by
students: solving numerical examples.
Example
1: Basic Unit Cost Calculation
A factory produces 10,000 units.
Costs incurred:
|
Particulars |
Amount
(₹) |
|
Direct Material |
2,00,000 |
|
Direct Labour |
1,00,000 |
|
Variable Factory Overhead |
50,000 |
|
Fixed Factory Overhead |
1,50,000 |
Solution:
STEP 1: Total Manufacturing Cost
(TMC)
= 2,00,000 + 1,00,000 + 50,000 + 1,50,000
= ₹5,00,000
STEP 2: Cost Per Unit (CPU)
= 5,00,000 ÷ 10,000
= ₹50 per unit
Thus, absorption cost per unit = ₹50
Example
2: Absorption Costing vs Marginal Costing (Profit Differences)
Many exam questions test this.
General
Behavior
|
Output–Sales
Relationship |
Absorption
Profit |
Marginal
Profit |
|
Production > Sales |
Higher |
Lower |
|
Production < Sales |
Lower |
Higher |
Why?
Because absorption costing places some fixed overhead into closing
stock, pushing profit upward if unsold stock increases.
This is one of the most important
MCQ/short answer areas in CA, CMA, CS examinations.
When Production ≠ Sales: The Profit Impact
Let’s make this real with a story.
Imagine Ritu, a small-scale
candle manufacturer. In December, she produces 5,000 candles but sells only
3,000. Under absorption costing, part of her fixed overhead goes into closing
stock (2,000 units). This increases her profit on paper. She doesn’t earn
more money; it’s just accounting treatment.
That’s why:
- When closing stock rises, absorption costing
shows higher profit.
- When closing stock falls, absorption costing
shows lower profit.
Importance & Practical Applications
Absorption costing is essential for:
1.
Financial Reporting & Audit
Required by:
- Companies Act
- Income Tax Department
- Statutory audit reports
2.
Inventory Valuation
Ensures transparent and accurate
reporting of:
- Finished goods
- Work-in-progress
3.
Tendering & Export Pricing
Full cost is necessary for:
- Government bids
- International contracts
4.
Internal Efficiency Analysis
Helps analyze:
- Overhead absorption
- Idle capacity
- Machine utilization
5.
Avoiding Cost Understatement
Incorrect valuation can mislead:
- Investors
- Lenders
- Management
Advantages of Absorption Costing
- Globally accepted and legally mandated
- Simple and traditional
- Calculates full cost per unit
- Suitable for long-term pricing
- Ensures overhead accountability
- Prevents stock undervaluation
Disadvantages of Absorption Costing
- Distorts profit when inventory fluctuates
- Arbitrary allocation of fixed overhead
- Not suitable for short-term decisions
- Can encourage overproduction to increase profit
- Contribution margin not shown
Impact Analysis: Business, Tax, and Academic
Perspectives
On
Business
Absorption costing encourages:
- Better capacity utilization
- Accurate budgeting
- Cost estimation for new product lines
On
Taxation
- Inventory valuation affects taxable income
- Higher closing stock → Higher profits → Higher tax
On
Academics
Forms a core topic in:
- CBSE Class 12
- B.Com / M.Com
- CA Intermediate
- CMA Foundation
- MBA Finance
Case Study: Bharat Engineering Works Pvt Ltd
Industry: Automobile components
Problem: Profits fluctuating despite stable sales.
Findings:
Management used marginal costing for inventory valuation. This undervalued
stock and made profit appear lower.
Actions Taken:
Switched to absorption costing as per audit recommendations.
Results:
- Inventory value increased by 12%
- Profit stabilized
- Improved credit rating
- Better investor confidence
This is why auditors insist on
absorption costing.
Common Misconceptions
❌
“Fixed overhead is not included.”
Fact: It is included — that’s the foundation.
❌
“Absorption costing increases cash profit.”
Fact: Only accounting profit changes; cash flows remain the same.
❌
“It’s suitable for decision making.”
Fact: Marginal costing is better for decisions.
❌
“It’s only used in manufacturing.”
Fact: Used in service industries for internal cost allocation
too.
Expert Opinion
“Absorption costing is not merely a
valuation method — it is a mindset that ensures companies account for the
complete cost structure of their products.”
— Dr. S. Mehra, ICAI Research Fellow
Absorption Costing vs Marginal Costing: Quick
Comparison Table
|
Feature |
Absorption
Costing |
Marginal
Costing |
|
Fixed OH |
Included |
Excluded |
|
Closing Stock |
Higher |
Lower |
|
Profit Impact |
Changes with stock |
Based on sales |
|
Decision Making |
Weak |
Strong |
|
Legal Requirement |
Mandatory |
Not mandatory |
Conclusion: Why You Must Master Absorption Costing
Absorption costing is here to stay.
While managerial accountants may prefer marginal costing for decisions, financial
accountants, auditors, tax professionals, and businesses rely on absorption
costing for compliance and accurate reporting.
If you’re preparing for exams or
working in industry, make sure you:
- Classify overheads carefully
- Use absorption costing for stock valuation
- Reconcile profit differences with marginal costing
- Allocate overheads logically and consistently
And if you're a student learning
from Learn with Manika, remember this: cost accounting becomes far
easier when you understand why a method exists, not just how it
works.
FAQs
Q1.
Is absorption costing mandatory?
Yes, for external reporting,
taxation, and inventory valuation.
Q2.
Which standards require it?
IAS-2, GAAP, Companies Act, and Cost
Accounting Standards.
Q3.
Are selling overheads included in product cost?
No. They are treated as period
costs.
Q4.
Which method is better for decision-making?
Marginal costing.
Q5.
Does absorption costing affect profit?
Yes, especially when production and
sales differ.
Related Key Terms
- Marginal Costing
- Cost of Goods Sold
- Overhead Absorption Rate
- Contribution Margin
- Prime Cost
- Factory Overhead
About the Author
Manika – Founder of “Learn with
Manika”
Manika is an accounting educator and financial content specialist with 11+
years of professional experience in taxation, accounting, and financial
reporting. Her platform “Learn with Manika” simplifies complex commerce
concepts for students and professionals through easy explanations, examples,
and practical insights.